Chris's Crime Forum

WE CARE ABOUT CRIME ONE CASE AT A TIME.
It is currently Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:32 am
View unanswered posts | View active topics


All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]



Welcome
Welcome to <strong>Chris's Crime Forum</strong>.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:13 pm
Posts: 4012
Location: Alberta
Vancouver–Last August, a 12-year-old girl found a sneaker on the beach and, intrigued at her discovery, she sat down, untied the laces and out fell the remains of a human foot.

She was likely the last person in British Columbia to pick up a shoe along the shoreline without fearing what they would find.

Since then, four other feet have washed ashore. What was thought to be a sixth foot was found on the shores of Vancouver Island on Wednesday, but investigators quickly discovered it was a hoax, a skeletonized animal paw, packed with seaweed and stuffed inside a sock and a running shoe.

From perfectly innocent explanations to downright diabolical hypotheses, the mystery of the five human feet has sparked countless theories. Speculation ranges from natural disasters, such as the tsunami of 2004, to the work of drug dealers, serial killers and human traffickers.

One theory gaining the most credence is a plane crash off Quadra Island three years ago with five men aboard. Only one of the bodies, that of Kirsten Stevens' husband Dave, has been found.

"No one really thought about this much until these feet started washing up. It's hard to remember what someone was wearing on their feet 3 1/2 years ago, whether our guys were wearing runners or not," said Stevens. "We're fairly certain we know."

Just two weeks before the first foot was found on Jedidiah Island last August, Kevin Decock, the brother of two of the men who died in the crash, trolled the ocean floor looking for clues near Quadra Island, using a fishing camera and equipment he designed himself.

Stevens and Sally Feast, whose brother Arnie was the pilot on the float plane, believe that action was enough to stir up the events that led to the feet washing onto shores down the Strait of Georgia.

"Something happened to make these shoes appear," said Feast. "We don't know what yet and we're hoping that with one door closing, another one will open to tell us what we need to know."

Feast already knows that three of the five feet do not belong to her brother. She is still waiting for the DNA results for the other two feet.

But the plane crash theory, if true, only tells part of the story. Four of the men are still missing, but five feet have been discovered, leaving an extra foot to be accounted for.


Other theorists believe the coastline is being used as a body dump for organized crime activity; a third scenario is a serial killer is at work.

In the past few years, more than 20 men in the Vancouver area have gone missing. Their disappearances have never been accounted for despite pleas from families for information.

This week, the family of two of those men offered rewards, pleading for information on the whereabouts of Gregory Cyr, 40, who vanished in October 2003, and Ron Carlow, 37, who disappeared in June 2007. This year alone, four men ranging in age from 19 to 32 have vanished.

Rob Gordon, head of the criminology department at Simon Fraser University, said it's reasonable to suggest that the missing men may be victims of a serial killer.

That possibility and the organized crime scenario are stronger than the theory about human trafficking, according to Gordon.

"There is every indication that the body parts have been in the water a long time and the feet disengaged from the rest of the cadaver and floated to the surface by virtue of the runners acting like life jackets," said Gordon.

However, human trafficking usually happens along Southeast Asia and China and it's unlikely the feet travelled such a great distance.

That discounts the theory that the severed feet belonged to bodies swept into the ocean by the 2004 tsunami.

Eric Kunze, who conducts research into ocean physics at the University of Victoria, said it would be impossible for the feet to have travelled from Asia to the coast of British Columbia.

"If feet were coming through from there, we would have thousands of feet coming onto the shores of B.C.," he said. "From an oceanographic standpoint, all we can really say at this point is they originated somewhere from the Strait of Georgia."

Dean Hildebrand, a forensic scientist at British Columbia Institute of Technology, who is working with the B.C. Coroners Service, said while the answers may not available yet, progress is being made.

"Forensic science takes time, especially when you're making linkages," he said. "While it's certainly unique to be finding so many feet in a row, it's not that unusual to find bones and human remains washed up on shores."


LINK


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 353
Location: North Carolina
Thanks Chris
Well this certainly adds new information.
Sneakers float!
Rubber soled shoes would be the footwear of choice if one were on a boat.
Rubber would last longer than flesh, and it seems it has been determined that they have been in the water. I don't think a sock would last very long, though. Is that what holds the foot together? Did this girl actually dump it out of the shoe?
It is interesting that the laces remained tied, and did not deteriorate. Did the laces not break when untied?
What kind of string are they made of? Are they the usual clothe laces that come with sneakers?
I want to know how well the deterioration of the flesh matches that of the cotton.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:13 pm
Posts: 4012
Location: Alberta
I'm with you Bill,I want answers as well.What origin are the feet,was one of them really a womans foot.Why does a foot float and not the head.I really think the coroner needs to make some form of statement,I am all for keeping some details secret,but inquiring minds want to know!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:47 pm
Posts: 182
Hi,
alabamamom here. I am new to this forum & hope that I can be of help.
As far as the shoes floating vs, a cranium floating, the cranium would eventually be nothing but bone , and hollow. It would therefore fill up similar to a bowl with water & would sink.
the shoes floating , if made of rubber or high tech light weight material like most ergonomic running shoes are now made recently , they would also have a shock absorbing innersoles that would be buoyant.

It is important to have disclosure of the type of running shoe , maufacturer & date of manufacture.
Gang members might wear a particular type /brand of shoes.
Jogger would wear a specific high tech style most likely of shoes.
Teens / students might wear a particular style / brand of shoes.

Medical professionals would wear high tech shock absorbent shoes , like med techs, male nurses aids , etc.

To me, the brand , type , and Price of the shoe will speak volumes of information !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:47 pm
Posts: 182
Late note to add...

The shoestrings on most jogging shoes nowdays are not 100% cotton.
Most are made of polyester / nylon blend .
Similar as ropes for boats.
It is virtually indestructable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 353
Location: North Carolina
Thank you, Alabamamom.
You've answered one of my questions.
Nylon/polyester shoestrings would certainly survive being in seawater.
I imagine they would also stay tied pretty tightly after rolling through the surf.
Are all modern running shoes made of synthetic material now days?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:47 pm
Posts: 182
You are welcome.
The high tech ones are made to not stretch or sweat , resist stains, and most importantly , they have the inner soles for shock absorbency.
However , some shoes, such as tennis shoes or keds , are not as high tech. The prices are up there in the jogging shoes $$ reflecting the high tech scientific research for their development.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:13 pm
Posts: 4012
Location: Alberta
Hi Alabamamom & welcome to the forum.Thanks for the great info! Something else to me that seems strange is all the feet were found in sneakers.Lets say for some reason it is just random persons feet,I can't imagine they would all be in sneakers.If you were boating casually and fell overboard chances are you could be wearing sandels or flip flops.All of these feet wearing the same type of shoe tends to make me think that yes for sure they are all linked one way or another.The coroner has stated he has found no connection which I just find hard to believe.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:47 pm
Posts: 182
Hello , Thanks for the welcome to the forum !

The only reason I can think of for all of the feet to have the sneakers on would be if a boat was having trouble and all were advised that everybody would have to abandon ship. I have read that you need to have on closed toe shoe to prevent sharks from being attracted to feet & toes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:44 pm
Posts: 353
Location: North Carolina
Allright People
Please tell me if I'm wrong.
At first report we have 6 feet. 5 are right feet and 1 is a left foot.
Doreen's report says the 6th foot is a fake. It does not say if this one fake foot is the one left foot.
Did I read this correctly?
So, are the 5 real feet all right feet?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: