Kick it and see if it moves.
This method has worked for me before.
It's easier to provoke a public reaction on current events than on something that happened last year, but it can be done.
Having broken the "silence" in Topix, a big question has come to the surface.
An inmate in a Mecklenberg County (Charlotte area) jail named Christopher Lamont Cooper had sent a written confession to the murder of Ira Yarmolenko to Erica Bryant, news anchor for WSOC-TV in Charlotte, NC.
Now you would think any news station that got a scoop like this would jump at the opportunity to report it, but they didn't. The question is "Why?"
This info was not revealed until a court hearing on Feb 2, and for a long time this was the only mention of it in the news. Police have quickly dismissed the confession due, they say, to a polygraph test. Such evidence is not even admissible in a court of law.
The website for WSOC-TV has no mention whatsoever of the name Christopher Cooper, or any confession they got in their mail. They have quite a few stories in there under the subject of Ira Yarmolenko.
Why? Was there a gag order?
If so, now that it has been revealed in court, why do they continue to keep silent about it? The biggest tv news station in Charlotte had an exclusive on it, but has done nothing with it.
www.wsoctv.com/Cooper has been arrested (since the murder) for multiple counts of rape, sexual assault, and strangulation, and is now serving time for these crimes. Now days, when a person confesses to murder, they want to make sure he's telling the truth. After all, it has occurred before that a person has confessed to a crime they didn't commit, although it is difficult to explain why they would say they did.
In the case of JonBenet Ramsey, it is easy to understand why the suspect would rather be in an American prison instead of one in Thailand.
In other cases, it is hard to understand at all. The case of Debbie Key is an example, and believe me, we are all still outraged over that.
Cooper submitted a confession in writing completely voluntarily. No one coerced him into it. But the man has lied before, so they have to question his reliability. He later changed his tune, and now claims he didn't kill anyone.
He claimed in his confession he was one of seven who committed the murder. Perhaps some or all of the others are in jail with him, and threatened him not to go through with his story.
I think it's about time someone turned over that stone.